Friday, July 29, 2011

New Book from George Wilder Jr.


PublishAmerica is proud to announce the recent release of George Wilder Jr.'s new book: Parenting, Back to the Script: for the 21st Century"!
Here's what the author says about the book: This is a parenting book unlike any other. It tells about the innocent children being preyed upon by predator parents. The book mostly talks about how not to be an extremely bad or a disengage parent of small and teenage children. It talks about how children who are born into this world knowing nothing at all about their parents, the environment, and the up bringing that will tell the entire story whether it's good or horrible. It talks about preventing any child from growing up and becoming a bad girl or the bad guy; soon to hurt another child or adult. Key points will be stressed again and again throughout this important book
We are offering you an opportunity to secure your personal copy of George Wilder Jr.’s exceptional book today.  Please click here: http://www.publishamerica.net/product43444.html to secure your copy of the book*, then click Add to Cart. For an introductory discount of 20%, use this coupon code: Discount20.


Thank you for your interest in our author's wonderful achievement.
Have a great day!
PublishAmerica
www.publishamerica.com
*Note: This message contains no virus; the link to your friend's book is safe. Your friend, our author, provided us with your email address. Our phone number is 301 695 1707 (business days, hours only).
PublishAmerica, a traditional book publisher headquartered in Frederick, Maryland, is the home of almost 40,000 talented authors. Our primary goal is to encourage and promote the works of new,
previously undiscovered writers. PublishAmerica pays advances and never charges any publishing fees.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

HELL BENT

Obama is just bent on giving away social security, medicare, medicaid, and other vital programs that help people. He will not listen to the American people when they tell him to leave those programs alone. He is going to lose this because he will cave in to his republicans like all those times before and the seniors will lose big. Those programs are not his to give away, he didn't make them, he didn't start them. He was just a community organizer. Why is he gambling with the lives of the elderly, children, and disabled? He has lost my vote. I will give it to Senator Bernie Sanders.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Our Children

The Children’s Defense Fund has just released a new report, The State of America’s Children® 2011, which paints a disturbing portrait of child needs across our country. With rampant unemployment, housing foreclosures, homelessness, hunger, and massive looming federal and state budget cuts, children’s well-being is in great jeopardy. One in five children is poor and children are our nation’s poorest age group. Child poverty increased almost 10 percent between 2008 and 2009, the largest single year increase since data were first collected. Fifteen and a half million children are adrift in a sea of poverty, and every 32 seconds another child is born poor. As our country struggles to climb out of the recession millions of our children are falling further behind.
Although there are more poor White than poor Black or Latino children, worsening income inequality and continuing racial disparities have an extra harsh combined impact on poor children of color. Many are pushed off the path of healthy development and into the Cradle to Prison Pipeline. Poor children are more likely to live in fragile families, lag in early childhood development, suffer abuse and neglect, be uninsured and in poor health, be denied a quality education, and experience other gaps that put them far behind non-poor peers. Millions of Black children are facing one of the worst crises since slavery, and in many areas, Hispanic and American Indian children are not far behind.
In the face of these deeply disturbing and growing child needs, some of our political leaders are heedlessly and heartlessly proposing that children, who have no belts to tighten, sacrifice their food and Head Start and other survival needs while asking nothing in sacrifice from powerful billionaires and corporations. Policies, programs, and essential services that we know help children survive and thrive—Medicaid and CHIP (the Children’s Health Insurance Program), the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant, WIC (the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children), SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Food Stamps), Early Head Start and Head Start, the Child Care and Development Block Grant, the Title I Education Program designed to help disadvantaged children, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act programs, Pell Grants, the Social Services Block Grant, and others—are all threatened with federal cuts and/or program changes that will further unravel the already porous safety net provided for poor children.
These looming federal cuts will compound cascading cuts in state and local funding for urgently needed early childhood development, K-12 education, higher education, mental health and other specialized treatment, and services for children in foster care and the juvenile justice system. Family stress has increased while family stability has deteriorated, with lost jobs, reduced unemployment compensation, restricted assistance and public health programs, and more scarce affordable housing.

As the President and Congress struggle to find a way to lower the budget deficit and to raise the debt ceiling before we default on our debt for the first time in history, I hope this new report on the perilous state of millions of our children will deter them from further cuts in essential food, health, education, and other supports children need. And I hope they will remember that children did not cause the budget deficit and hurting them will not solve it. They need to address the unjust federal tax benefits enjoyed by the wealthiest corporations and individuals, some of whom pay not a penny in taxes and enjoy tax rates lower than working families whose modest incomes do not allow them to make ends meet.


We know that poverty impairs children’s emotional, intellectual, and physical development and ends up costing our nation billions of dollars in lost productivity and increased health care costs. We know how to give children a healthy start, rescue them from the wolf of hunger, and keep them well-nourished. We know how to give children a head start to help them get ready for and be better able to achieve in school. We know how to provide children a quality education. Yet how pound foolish to cut early childhood programs, school days, recess, and teachers they need to succeed. We know how to prevent child abuse and neglect, find permanent families for children in foster care, and keep children out of our costly and ineffective juvenile justice system. How foolish to cut the investments that could keep children out of trouble and of jail. To paraphrase what our mothers and grandmothers taught us, if you know better, you should do better. What is it going to take to get our leaders to get it?


Our vulnerable children must not be sacrificial lambs on the altar of adult politics. As CDF’s faith allies gather at the Annual Samuel DeWitt Proctor Institute for Child Advocacy Ministry at CDF-Haley Farm, the urgency of resisting misguided budget choices is reflected in our theme this year, “Justice, Justice Shall You Pursue: Answering God’s Call to Protect Children.” Every person of faith should revisit the prophets and the gospels and the tenets of all great faiths that require us as individuals, congregations, and communities to answer God’s call to nurture and protect all children. I hope our public officials will think hard, too, about what they value and whether their choices will contribute towards a more a helping society.

Marian Wright Edelman

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Lord Help Us.

On its current course, the United States is four weeks away from defaulting on its debt for the first time in its history. If that happens, businesses will fail. Financial institutions will fail. Home values will decline. Mortgage rates will skyrocket. Spending and investment will all but disappear. Social Security checks will stop being mailed. Everything from military pay to food inspection will be compromised, if not fully cut off. The millions upon millions of Americans who are unemployed or underemployed will be joined by millions more.
Across the world, America’s second financial collapse in three years will drag down already fragile economies in Europe, Latin America and Asia, potentially creating a “worldwide depression,” as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid described it. In short, we would be thrown back deep into economic turmoil—only this time with even fewer tools to crawl our way out.
In theory, this is unthinkable, and it will be remedied by reasonable political parties making reasonable concessions across the negotiating table. But Republicans have been negotiating in bad faith, unwilling to compromise even an inch on their extremist and absolutist positions. Some are no longer willing to come to the table at all.
With that backdrop, President Obama may find that there is only one course left to avoid a global economic calamity: Invoke Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which says that “the validity of the public debt of the United States … shall not be questioned.” This constitutional option is one that the president alone may exercise.
If the Aug. 2 deadline arrives and no deal has been made, Obama could use a plain reading of that text to conclude—statutory debt ceiling or not—that he is constitutionally required to order the Treasury to continue paying America’s bills. In that sense, this is not just a constitutional option, it is a constitutional obligation, one even the Tea Party will have trouble denying.
There are reasons why such a solution is less than ideal. There ought to be some concern about executive overreach; the very idea of the president deciding which laws are and are not constitutional has disturbing ramifications. And to the extent that the goal of the move is to prevent market panic, it remains an open question as to whether it would succeed. But market panic will surely come with the failure to reach a deal altogether. The consequences of default are simply too severe—and too long-lasting—to take this option off the table. It may not be ideal as an elective choice, but as an option of last resort, it is a necessity.
Editor's Note: Read the full text of Katrina's column here.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
  • Share550
  • |
  • |
  • StumbleUpon.com
  • |
  • Recommended by 0
  • |
  • Text Size A | A | A
If you like this article, consider making a donation.
Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.

Comments

[ Post Your Comment ]
Showing 50 comments of 71 - next 21 ››
Current Sort: last to first
1. posted by: RMForbes at 07/08/2011 @ 8:00pm
I'm not as pessimistic as you Beethoven. I think the President has the Republicans by the short hairs and will force them into major concessions because even rank and file Republicans know it is plain wrong to allow extremely wealthy investment bankers and hedge fund managers a major loophole that exempts them from paying income and payroll taxes on their personal profits. These people are billionaires and get to defer most of their income 20 or more years down the road while paying just a flat 15% capital gains rate on the income they take now. Even the Republicans know this is wrong and would not be able to spin it into anything that could help their cause. Removing this one loophole will increase federal revenues at least $44 billion a year.
2. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/08/2011 @ 7:33pm
When all is said and done, their....whoops, that should be there, not their.
3. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/08/2011 @ 7:32pm
1. posted by: RMForbes at 07/08/2011 @ 4:06pm
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's how I think this thing will play out. Nothing will happen in time for the deadline which means they'll have to craft another extension. Then, they'll put the squeeze on Obama to cut social security, medicare and medicaid with a media blitz similar to the health care fiasco. When all is said and done, their will be a few loopholes closed only to open a few other ones so that corporations will still be able to hide their cash and not pay their taxes.
Obama and the dems will say they closed loopholes which will generate revenue while the republicans will say that that the Bush tax cuts were continued and that when they win in 2012, they'll become a permanent deal.
From there, Obama will pretty much be handed a certain loss in 2012 for being shown not only as weak president, but also a turn coat to those who voted for him. That will be the end of the democratic party.
4. posted by: 2HAPPY at 07/08/2011 @ 4:57pm
2. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/08/2011 @ 3:38pm
Report abusive | Ignore This User
....If Obama wants to be president, he better start acting like one...
====
Poor, Angry, Depressed and Unhinged Wolfie.......still living the good life of pre-Nov., 2008!
5. posted by: RMForbes at 07/08/2011 @ 4:06pm
Yes the judicial branch determines a law constitutional or not but when presented with a conflict that requires the executive branch to act they must choose the path set forth by the constitutions. Yes Congress spends and raises revenues but the executive branch controls the national debt and the Treasury department specifically maintains the full faith and credit of our nation. If I were a Republican leader I would getting the best deal I could now before the President has to make a choice to protect the nations credit.
6. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/08/2011 @ 3:38pm
1. posted by: RMForbes at 07/08/2011 @ 3:10pm
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
The GOP think that the unemployment results give them the upper hand whereas they have been instrumental in shutting out anything that would help employ people.
They believe in trickle down which has put this country on the edge of a cliff.
If Obama wants to be president, he better start acting like one and quit appeasing the neocons and those thinking along the same lines as Milton Friedman and Grover Norquist. I fear that Obama, in his heart, think like the two men mentioned above, but now is the time of truth for him.
He will not be elected again if he caves into the 24/7 right wing media machine pushing cuts in social security and medicare while only paying lip service to possible closures of tax break loopholes for the ultrawealthy.
But, that's the way things are lining up, so in 2012, things are really gonna get bad when the corporate world takes over for good. As Shadow pointed out, Obama has paved the way, now is the time for the plutocrats to take control of this country with an iron fist. Kiss all social safety nets goodbye, kiss decent working wages goodbye and kiss any form of retirement goodbye.
7. posted by: srjenkins at 07/08/2011 @ 3:37pm
"If President Obama needed to go passed the current debt limit without a deal from the unyielding Republican, he could simply state that the debit ceiling law is unconstitutional because no law passed by congress can conflict with the federal Constitution."
Except for the minor detail that determining constitutionality is the role of the Supreme Court and not the Executive branch, and according to the Constitution, all spending has to go through the House.
The world's a little more complicated than that, Horatio.
8. posted by: RMForbes at 07/08/2011 @ 3:10pm
The debt limit bill was an add-on amendment to the second Liberty Bond act of 1917. If President Obama needed to go passed the current debt limit without a deal from the unyielding Republican, he could simply state that the debit ceiling law is unconstitutional because no law passed by congress can conflict with the federal Constitution. These Teapublicans really don't have as strong a bargaining position as they think.
9. posted by: srjenkins at 07/08/2011 @ 1:41pm
Darin sayeth, "An "intractable" problem is a problem with no solution. The poor are an intractable problem. There is no way to eliminate the poor. Bankrupting the entire country doesn't eliminate poverty, it just mean that every single person suffers because of it."
I'm beginning to appreciate that fictional character (was it in a Oscar Wilde story?) who decided to stop talking after 30 because they had already said everything. I'll just cut and paste here:
...every discussion about Social Security and Medicare assumes the world remaining as is - so no changes where contribution caps are eliminated, changes to benefit age, or medical advances that keep people healthier, longer (or even the opposite, where there is a problem of some sort - say a wave of brain tumors killing large parts of the population earlier caused by hours and hours of holding small microwave transmitters near one's head). In other words, it's all fantasy [and not an intractable problem].
10. posted by: pathmaker1 at 07/08/2011 @ 12:55pm
Please talk about MILLIONAIRES as being those that earn an average of $20,000 PER WEEK and, thusly, Change the Words and NOT the Message!!
11. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/08/2011 @ 11:26am
5. posted by: batteredup at 07/08/2011 @ 3:09am I like the idea of a general national strike.
7. posted by: rbourgeau at 07/08/2011 @ 1:29am general strike! shut the country down! it's time to be heard!
_____________
George Will wrote a fantastic column about this "possibility" several years ago. The #1 healthcare problem for America's poor is obesity. You're never going to get them to show up to a protest because you're never going to get them off the couch.
You're only hope is a couch protest, but how will the 50% of Americans who pay 100% of the income taxes recognized it? How will we be able to differentiate between America's poor sitting on their couches, playing X-box and protesting American with sitting on their couches, playing X-box, and cashing thier welfare checks?
12. posted by: JATL at 07/08/2011 @ 11:01am
Idea: why not totally stop the tax cuts to corporations that export our jobs?? Either use American know how or get taxed more than your "fair share"!
13. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/08/2011 @ 9:46am
If Obama tried this, he would turn a debt crisis into a Constitutional crisis. He would surely be impeached and in all likelihood convicted and removed from office.
14. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/08/2011 @ 9:14am
5. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 7:18pm
The end result is bankruptcy in either case.
____________
But there is a big difference between bankruptcy for 5% to 10% of INDIVIDUALS who get sick and can't afford care, and bankruptcy of 100% OF THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.
An "intractable" problem is a problem with no solution. The poor are an intractable problem. There is no way to eliminate the poor. Bankrupting the entire country doesn't eliminate poverty, it just mean that every single person suffers because of it.
15. posted by: batteredup at 07/08/2011 @ 3:35am
Re: post #49 ... O'Bomber had a built in advantage that precluded any handicap his race may have created - he ran against a PSTD burnout backed by a brainless barbie doll.
16. posted by: batteredup at 07/08/2011 @ 3:09am
I like the idea of a general national strike. Funny thing; my son and I were just discussing this about an hour ago, before I read it here. Let's push this idea around the web till it gains traction.
17. posted by: batteredup at 07/08/2011 @ 3:07am
So where is O'Bomber gonna get the spine to do this? He hasn't shown it yet - and he won't in this battle either. Just like he caved in on his public option promise, just like he caved in on rolling back the bush era tax cuts, this gutless shill will roll over and bark like a republican when push comes to shove. I'll bet my house on it.
18. posted by: rbourgeau at 07/08/2011 @ 1:29am
general strike! shut the country down! it's time to be heard!
19. posted by: Dwight Wall at 07/08/2011 @ 1:08am
Darin, you forgot the preface:
Rep: I stole all of your money through uneven trade deals, privatization, theft of public assets, theft of retirement funds, manipulating the tax code, and declaring ketchup a vegetable. If you argue, I'll do a Citizens United on you.
Dem: Oh please sir, how may I serve you?
Rep: I've got a wallet full of money and I want to keep it.
20. posted by: Dwight Wall at 07/08/2011 @ 1:02am
Katrina, unfortunately Congress for years has engaged in various loopholes agreed by both parties to avoid their obligations under the Constitution to make politically difficult decisions (see the War Powers Act). I believe this invocation of the 14th would probably stand, but it will never happen.
In fact, one of the notable things about this president is his repeated efforts to get Congress to fulfill its constitutional duties (see the development of the health care legislation in which Obama insisted that Congress actually legislate in a manner originally envisioned by the Constitution).
That, of course, is a very positive interpretation - I fear the reality is our system of checks and balances have been corrupted by money into a system of buck-passing. Thats why the Supreme Court is increasingly filling the vacuum and making the ultimate decisions.
21. posted by: POSEIDON at 07/08/2011 @ 12:47am
Katrina Vanden Huevel,
Getting desparate, are we? I disagree wholeheartedly. I say do not invoke the 14th, allow the federal gov't to shutdown, allow the Asylum States of Amerika to collapse, and then begin anew with referendum voting by the people themselves. This way, they will have no excuses for when they bring about their own demise................
22. posted by: Winski at 07/08/2011 @ 12:34am
Katrina... Thank you VERY much for making this case so strongly in the article and in your TV appearance this afternoon.
It seems people that SEEMED to have some brain cells working two or three months ago have completely lost those working brain cells but burned out all the working brain cells of everyone else within 10 miles of their current where-abouts !
IF the President would do this TOMORROW, all the leverage every republican ever even thought they had would be gone... Immediately.. The playing field would be leveled and any rational thinkers left could at least begin to craft a real solution to the nations requirements...
Again, thanks !
23. posted by: DHFabian at 07/08/2011 @ 12:11am
If Americans were actually as worried as they say, we'd see a an updated version of the Poor People's March on Washington, pulling in millions of working class people, and those far worse off. I might be wrong, but it looks like this generation couldn't be moved off their butts with a crowbar.
Either fight back or surrender and shut up.
24. posted by: Bounce at 07/07/2011 @ 11:06pm
REPUBLICANS ARE CRAZY, OUT OF THEIR MINDS!!!!
What kind of world do the Republicans live in, Republican Orrin Hatch says the poor should pay there share also.
25. posted by: DHFabian at 07/07/2011 @ 7:22pm
Once again, we see the reckless Republicans threatening the entire United States. You can't reduce the deficit while continuing massive tax cuts for those corporations that use this money to export our jobs, and while maintaining a state of ongoing warfare. Restore pre-Reagan tax rates, impose serious disincentives on exporting jobs, directly invest in job creation. Remember that Social Security doesn't add a penny to the debt. Don't repeat welfare "reform," funneling more public dollars into the bank accounts of the rich, only to end up back in deep debt again. End this cycle. The rich caused our economic disaster, let them pay for it.
26. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 7:18pm
Darin sayeth, "Actually, he did. 116% of the increase is entitlement programs meaning the military, FBI, courts, homeland security and the rest all decrease as a percentage of GDP."
From the article:
"Almost all factions within the GOP are united around the same answer: keep taxes where they have been for forty years, restrain discretionary spending, and reform entitlements."
Yes, I suppose restraining discretionary spending would mean not engaging in elective, trillion dollar wars. Unfortunately, there seems to be a relationship here. Republicans trying to "starve the beast" engage in trillion dollar wars and their own entitlement programs catering to voting blocks they need to get elected (e.g., prescription drug benefits - where would 2004 be without the voting seniors on prescription meds?). Then, you have fee-for-service blowing up costs for existing entitlements, which "starves the war beast". The end result is bankruptcy in either case.
But, hey, saying you are a fiscal conservative is popular these days.
27. posted by: Yad061 at 07/07/2011 @ 5:35pm
Like I've said before, let's just raise the ceiling to, say, a quintillion. That will warn people what's going to happen to the USA if this nonsense goes on.
We won't be Greece, because we can print our own money. We'll be Argentina, Zimbabwe or Weimar Germany.
Got change for an Obuck? You know, the bill with President Obama's face on it, a one and seven zeroes, and it buys a single loaf of bread.
28. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/07/2011 @ 5:14pm
2. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 5:03pm
Damn, half being current and past military to the tune of 1.3 trillion dollars? I bet if we could slash that we'd address your federal spending as a part of GDP in a jiffy! But, sadly, the military-industrial-complex is a sacred cow. Didn't see Jay Cost talk about that anywhere (so surprised!).
____________
Actually, he did. 116% of the increase is entitlement programs meaning the military, FBI, courts, homeland security and the rest all decrease as a percentage of GDP.
29. posted by: 2HAPPY at 07/07/2011 @ 5:09pm
9. posted by: eliz77 at 07/07/2011 @ 3:51pm
Report abusive | Ignore This User
Our Prez is young and untrained. He has no yankee horsetrading sense.
====
That's Racist!
30. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 5:03pm
Darin: Yes, I remember. The problem is the graph (and the article it is part of) is absurd.
For one, everyone likes to talk about out-of-control medical costs and Medicare, but no one likes to talk about what the government looks like sans those large entitlement programs, like the War Resister's League chart does:
http://www.warresisters.org/sites/default/files/FY2012piechart-color.pdf
Damn, half being current and past military to the tune of 1.3 trillion dollars? I bet if we could slash that we'd address your federal spending as a part of GDP in a jiffy! But, sadly, the military-industrial-complex is a sacred cow. Didn't see Jay Cost talk about that anywhere (so surprised!).
Second, every discussion about Social Security and Medicare assumes the world remaining as is - so no changes where contribution caps are eliminated, changes to benefit age, or medical advances that keep people healthier, longer (or even the opposite, where there is a problem of some sort - say a wave of brain tumors killing large parts of the population earlier caused by hours and hours of holding small microwave transmitters near one's head). In other words, it's all fantasy.
31. posted by: Rich Austin at 07/07/2011 @ 5:00pm
cont'd...
last two words of 7)
"flowing again."
8) After social and economic justice, and peace, has been secured and we’re all back to work we can then go about practicing ballot box revenge. We can toss out congressional and legislative corporatists and replace them with true representatives of we the people.
9) Stop worrying about the rich guy. There is a class war. It has been going on ever since the first worker was enslaved to set the first stone in the first pyramid in ancient Egypt. Our job, as members of the working class, is to see to it that the scales held by Lady Justice are evenly balanced. It is our obligation so that future generations can live in peace and security. Right now the scales are horribly out of whack, and people are suffering. Don’t worry about Daddy Warbucks and his ilk. They will always live quite comfortably, albeit not with all the money they want.
10) Stop whining. Get involved. We – me, you, and other workers - are the answers to our needs.
11) Here’s to a general strike for justice and peace!
32. posted by: kbrown2225 at 07/07/2011 @ 4:55pm
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
That section merely means that Congress is authorized to pass any necessary laws to support the legislation. It is boiler-plate language, the Executive does the actual enforcing of all laws and Constitutional mandates.
33. posted by: Gary Waldman at 07/07/2011 @ 4:47pm
This whole conversation has gotten completely out of control. So much so that even the Democratic party has lost focus. Politics, supported by media coverage that is far more concerned with ratings via sensationalism than true education of the public, has taken over to the point of mass confusion of the issues at hand.
The debt ceiling MUST be raised and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with next year's budget nor does it require a deficit reduction plan to be enacted before doing so. The Democrats asked for a 'clean' vote on raising the debt ceiling months ago, as is THE NORM and Boehner & Company refused. Any raise in the debt ceiling had to be tied to 'significant deficit reduction.' Unfortunately no one remembers that because if was treated like a minor news story at the time.
Apparantly not even the White House remembers.
Last night I heard Pat Buchanan actually assert that President Obama is (to paraphrase) 'guilty of extrotion as he is holding the entire economy and financial health of the US hostage because he wants to raise taxes."
I heard that and knew immediately how politically potent that message was and expected to hear it again and again as a new Republican talking point. Lo and behold ... I have heard that horrendous lie over and over today and just read it in these comments. Horrible.
The Democrats insist that said 'significant deficit reduction' must include new revenue as well as spending cuts. But this can be...
34. posted by: boolean sheet at 07/07/2011 @ 4:07pm
A bumper sticker I might like to see: "Feingold-Sanders 2012"
35. posted by: Rich Austin at 07/07/2011 @ 4:07pm
Waa, waa, waa. Obama this. Reid and Pelosi that. McConnell is a sociopath and Boehner is a boner.
Lawmakers are not our salvation….never were and never will be. We are our own saviors. Here’s how that works:
1) Be honest. Admit the disparity of wealth and income in our nation has no moral or ethical basis, and that the divide is wider today than at any time since the 1920s.
2) Rich people can be rich, but not at the expense of even one working class person. They get to have oodles, just not all they want.
3) Recognize that there is no punishment in having a billion dollars and having to pay 90% of it in taxes. The remaining $100 million should keep anyone off food stamps. In other words, stop making excuses for the excesses of the super-rich.
4) The only thing – the only thing – that capitalists fear is an interruption in their profit flow.
5) The only power that the working class has is its ability to withhold its labor. When that happens the flow of profit to capitalists ceases. When that happens we’ll get their “ear”.
6) Be courageous enough to participate in a national general strike. Shut it down! Make the capitalists come to us “suing for peace”.
7) Screw the lawmakers. We cannot count on them. The majority of them have been purchased by the aforementioned capitalists. If we hurt the capitalists they in turn will instruct their political minions to pass the kinds of laws we want in order to get commerce...
36. posted by: theshadowknows at 07/07/2011 @ 4:06pm
5. posted by: justplainbill at 07/07/2011 @ 12:11pm
It continues to amaze me how naive many of you guys are. The GOP is reactionary and stupid, for sure, but they are not the Nazi party.
And, even though he is doing it right in front of your noses, you are still blind to the TweedleDee/TweedleDum legislative dance. Obama is not compromising with the right nor is he capitulating. He is using the right as a greater threat, a greater evil, to get his, and his bosses, austerity measures passed. His belief if that you and others like you will accept his lessor of two evils and, voilà, you are.
Obama is playing you like a fiddle (while the economy still burns).
37. posted by: tampsa at 07/07/2011 @ 3:59pm
I'm afraid that section 4 of the 14th says nothing about the president. In fact, section 5 clearly says that congress shall implement this.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
38. posted by: tampsa at 07/07/2011 @ 3:59pm
I'm afraid that section 4 of the 14th says nothing about the president. In fact, section 5 clearly says that congress shall implement this.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
39. posted by: Yad061 at 07/07/2011 @ 3:58pm
posted by: cka2nd at 07/07/2011 @ 2:28pm
I know, but justplainbill complaining about Nazis while President Obama's bombers are putting craters where Hitler's panzers used to roam is just too good an image!
40. posted by: seraphi at 07/07/2011 @ 3:56pm
I don't believe that the President can do what you propose for him to do. Yes, the 14th Amendment does provide that “validity of the public debt of the United States… shall not be questioned.” However, enforcement of Section 4 was expressly delegated in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to "Congress [who] shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." That would make the 14th Amendment of the Constitution akin to an enabling statute. An enabling statute does not provide remedies but authorizes another branch of government to provide for remedies. To make this very long story short, until Congress legislates to provide for provisions to enforce Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, the President has no power to enforce the purported provisions of the Amendment. As much as I'd like for your quick fix to the problem to be true, the Constitution does not allow it.
41. posted by: eliz77 at 07/07/2011 @ 3:51pm
If the Repugs are so determined not to raise taxes, why do they think cutting money for working people, orphans, the ill, and the elderly is not a tax hike in these instances? They will raise taxes on the rest of us while protecting the gross wealth of the upper 1% and corporations.
Our Prez is young and untrained. He has no yankee horsetrading sense. If the Repugs won't take any of the really good deals he has offered, he needs to come down hard on 100% tax cuts and no cuts to entitlements and health care. That is the starting point in real negotiations and would actually be fair and would work. Just get rid of the Bush tax cuts and raise hedgefund taxes to 70 or 90%. Not unreasonable. When we had only one war there was a 90% tax on the wealthy. It made it to their advantage to invest in production and jobs in the country and led to a solid economy. They did not go hungry or homeless then, and would not now. Everyone talks about how the banks are not lending because of uncertainty. Cowards groveling around their greed should be taxed and taxed until they get brave enough to invest.
42. posted by: cka2nd at 07/07/2011 @ 3:28pm
posted by: Yad061 at 07/07/2011 @ 12:41pm
Actually, Libya was already an Italian colony.
43. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/07/2011 @ 3:14pm
2. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 2:46pm
Darin: Ah, yes. An argument using projections 75 years out. If current trends continue,
_________________
You remember that I'm an actuary, right? Demographics are destiny. You cannot escape destiny.
44. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/07/2011 @ 2:50pm
1. posted by: justplainbill at 07/07/2011 @ 12:11pm
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Problem is that Obama is just a little less puffy than the GOP...but not by much. He's been caving into their demands since 2009. What kills me is that the people who elected him are the ones he's spitting on. The republicans elected in 2010 are the ones he's trying to appease, but his mistake is that in 2010 most of the seats the dems lost were blue dog traitors posing as dems.
Now, Obama is just another blue dog dem or should I say republican lite. I can't believe a democratic president is suggesting cuts to social security and medicare while not saying one damn thing about the military budget, 3 wars, corporate welfare, how much congress and he are paid and what their benefits are...how about slashing some of that first. Lead by example, not this do as I say, but not as I do crap.
At present, this congress has to be one of the worst if not the worst ever and we have a president who's caving into them. Has anybody told Obama about the separation of power and why the president has the power he has? Appeasing the crooked in Congress isn't helping Americans, it's lining the pockets of the already rich and shameless.....and extremely crooked. Obama, strap on a set for Christ's sake!
45. posted by: srjenkins at 07/07/2011 @ 2:46pm
Darin: Ah, yes. An argument using projections 75 years out. If current trends continue, Darin will be a brain in a vat in 2100 but still making silly arguments on The Nation's website utilizing his brain to Internet interface.
46. posted by: theshadowknows at 07/07/2011 @ 2:23pm
5. posted by: michael26 at 07/07/2011 @ 11:34am
All this talk of whether Obama is weak or strong misses the reality of his Presidency. The typical liberal approach to power is give the electorate the "less of two evils" or the "lessor pain" using the conservatives as the "threat" of something more evil, of inflicting greater pain. Obama is not loosing the fight nor winning the fight with the right. He and the phony left are using the right as a threat so that you and others will accept the lessor pain. Regardless of whether you support Obamanomics or Ryannomics, you are going to get pain. That the Dems and the Reps agree upon.
47. posted by: Darin_The_Fat_Troll_is_Back at 07/07/2011 @ 1:36pm
The other reason Obama is going to cave in these negotiations is because Dems don't seem to understand what negotiation is. Dems seem to think negotiation is where neither one of us gets everything we want, but both get something.
Rep: I've got a wallet full of money and I want to keep it.
Dem: I want to give all of your money to my friends. Let the negotiation begin!
Rep: You're not getting my money.
Dem: Okay, I'll settle for giving half of your money to my friends.
Rep: You're not getting my money.
Dem: Okay, you win, I'll settle for giving 40% of your money to my friends.
Rep: You're not getting my money.
Dem: Look, I'm not going to feel very good about myself unless I give at least 25% of your money to my friends.
Rep: You're not getting my money.
Dem: Look my freinds really need your money. How about 10%?
Rep: You're not getting my money.
Dem: You're mean.
48. posted by: Yad061 at 07/07/2011 @ 12:41pm
Careful with them rants justplainbill!
Remember, the Axis powers invaded Libya in WWII. Who gave the order (without following the War Powers Act) to attack Libya this time?
49. posted by: justplainbill at 07/07/2011 @ 12:11pm
Do not make the same mistake you did in 2010 and stay at home or not vote for the Democrat. This old yellow dog democrat does not like the attempts to compromise either, I personnaly think he should go a little "gangsta" on the GOP but he is still trying to compromise. If you stay at home then the American people lose. This is 1938, the GOP are the Nazis, and the American working class and working poor are the Jews. Will you fight or be lead to slaughter? Cast your vote for the party of the people, the Democrats, or you will keep the Nazis in power and we will all die.
50. posted by: Beethoven1 at 07/07/2011 @ 11:55am
Obama is too gutless, just like all U.S. presidents, to look "weak" on defense. My opinion is that he is weak. It would take courage to cut defense and explain to the American people why all the wars are worthless and bringing the country to total destruction.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
OK Michael, I believe you have me on that one. In that case then, Obama and the dems will pretend to close a couple of loopholes (of which they'll leave even more loopholes for the wealthy to exploit) while gutting more of the safety net for the poor.
So,you may be correct, but if you are, this country is toast.
There's more to the U.S. than the investment classes and sooner or later the investment classes will find out that they are heavily outnumbered by the poor and middle class folks.
They start putting people on the street, they will be opening a can of worms they'll wish to hell they'd never have opened.
Showing 50 comments of 71 - next 21 ››
Current Sort: last to first

Post Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Smoke On This

Smoke on this:

“President Obama has done more for us in this short time then Bush ever did in 8 years.

1. Kill Osama Bin Laden
2. Heath Care Reform. (First Person To Everrr Get It Done 44 Presidents Later)
3. Repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell
4. Bank Reform
5. Bring Troops Home (Happening in July - August)
6. Focusing On New Energy Platforms (Stopping Gas Subsidies As We Speak)
7. Help Small Businesses (17+ New Tax Cuts For SMBs)
8. Financial Reform Act
9. Create Jobs (Yes its going slower than we want but its moving. 2 million + private sector jobs created over 12 consecutiv­­­e months)
10. Pushed Stem Cell Research Forward
11. Increasing Foreign Relations
12. Equal Pay For Woman Act etc...

Next President Obama wants to fix the economy and the job market but it took the last President 8 years to screw it up to this level but you want this President to fix it in only 3 years. I think your asking for to much in such a short amount of time.

Also a lot of things President Obama is trying to do for the jobs market is getting stopped by the House Republican­­s and Congress. Where is your outrage for them? People like you gave control of the House to the Republican­­s and what have they done for you since they took over? A big fat nothing.